5 Best Lines From Review Of Entire Taco Bell Dollar Menu


They did it wrong. Start with the tostada. It’s the best thing.

Originally posted on Consumerist:

He ate all this stuff so you wouldn't have to. [via AdWeek]
He ate all this stuff so you wouldn’t have to. [via AdWeek]
This week, Taco Bell took a break from its 172-year tradition of selling handcraftd, top-of-the-line, high-priced authentic Mexican cuisine to launch a dollar menu. Since even that is too expensive to convince me to eat at the Bell, I have to rely on some brave canaries willing to test the air of this fast food coal mine to see if this stuff is safe.

View original 243 more words

On the “No Subsidies” message

The visual effects business in LA is seeing numerous bankruptcies, and the vfx companies and workers are thrown together in a desperate struggle to exist.  Two years, they have protested at the Oscars, and this year the message was “no subsidies”.

Before I continue, I must say that I support the VFX lawsuit.  I think this conflict is significant to anyone working to produce digital outputs, within a global workforce, and can be outsourced via the internet.  It’s also a site where we need more labor solidarity, because it’s one of the few non-unionized businesses in the local entertainment industry, which is mostly organized labor.  I went with a small sign representing Bright Future Jobs, a lobbying organization for programmers and other IT workers.  I also am employed by AFL-CIO, but wasn’t going to the march to represent them; it was on my own time.

The employment disclaimer is important because in the previous week, the IATSE had a rally to create pressure on the city of L.A. to spend money on a subsidy to keep production in L.A.  So, I don’t want to sound like I’m either pro-subsidy or anti-subsidy.  I support the subsidy in L.A., because I’m a resident, and I’d love to keep more production in L.A., and support the local economy by putting more people to work.  It’s my tax money, and it should be spent to compete against other cities offering subsidies to the industry.

It would be fantastic if these subsidies were illegal, but they are not.  To take a principled stand and refuse to pay probably means more production leaves the city.

I can also understand why the IATSE might not want to promote the VFX protesters “subsidies are evil” message.  You don’t want to rally for subsidies, then march against them, and confuse everyone.

It’s really simple: their subsidies are evil, and our subsidies are good.


What gets me is that we’re even having slogans making a moral issue of a subsidy.

Ultimately, a subsidy is a government spending decision that benefits a private business, usually for the purpose of local economic development.  It’s morally ambiguous.  It’s also  common.

The morality of a subsidy is most often brought up by people who advocate for laissez faire economic policies.  They think all subsidies are evil.  They distort “free markets”, which are inherently good, in their view.  Their implied, or stated, solution is to eliminate all subsidies.

Good luck with that.  Voters and politicians in the US cannot affect the politicians and laws in Canada and New Zealand; we can only affect our own laws.

Given that political constraint, the solution to these subsidies isn’t to eliminate them, but to establish a “countervailing duty” (CVD) which is a tariff or tax on work brought into this country from the other country that is paying a subsidy.  It’s what the WTO uses as the solution to subsidies, and has the desired effect to prevent runaway jobs.

Getting caught in the “subsidies are evil” message can make it difficult to argue for or accept a CVD, because that’s arguably just a “reverse subsidy” (that also happens to raise money for the government, another potential bugaboo).

Personally, I would prefer a message of “Exported jobs, then imported artwork? Pay a fine!”

It’s a little wordy, but includes all the elements of  the story of the global digital media worker, and ends with a solution that anyone can understand.

Compu-Wasted in LA

(I’m not an expert in this.)  Here’s some info about the computer junk universe.

Electronic Waste Recycling Act of 2003: Covered Electronic Waste Payment System (SB 20/SB 50) established the EWaste business.  It collects taxes on products, and distributes payments for collecting product for recycling.  The state’s friendly website with info is at eRecycle.org.

You can beg for parts at: Trash Nothing (directory of junk exchangers), LAReUseIt, LA Freecycle, Craigslist’s Free and Computer listings.

You can buy parts on Ebay or Craigslist, of course.

Other ways to find them are to poke around dumpsters and behind buildings.  People leave old computers out for scavengers.

For surplus parts and new parts check out Apex Electronics, All Electronics, ITC Electronics, Marvac, Frys, Pacific Radio, Electronic City.  These tend to be expensive.

(LA Dumpster Dive does free food… but maybe they’d have other things.)

Computer Giveaway Market Numbers

I’ve been fixing up computers and giving them away, and what can’t be fixed gets bundled into “a box of parts” and given away as ewaste.

So far, six systems have been donated, and two boxes of parts have been claimed.  At least one system and one box of parts are left.

The people were found on craigslist, mostly.  Respondents are mostly men.  Most seem to be working class, or unemployed (meaning they are no longer working class, because they’re out of work).

I have seen better systems going into ewaste centers around L.A.  I suspect that there is demand for those computers, even the broken ones.  As noted in the prior post, the responses to these giveaways are quick and numerous.  Transactions happen in a matter of half an  hour to an hour.